long as this climate of opinion remain, and the difficulties of child rearing - That we ourselves have created - will remain, there will be many men in the future, the decision to the child want to or can not grasp.
women must question the legitimacy of a non-existing desire for a child with difficulty, even from themselves men. Man's a Man without a child. Is that all laid down organic? Some certainly. But the impetus of the social environment have since ancient times to enhance the biological scaffolds and / or weaken the behavioral tendency: in the stone age, a male brooding instinct was not needed, nor in patriarchy. Only now, in the democracy of the 21st century society demands parental care suddenly out of Man.
room without people
No one knows what a "natural" population of Germany. The time of Goethe, in 1800 - a period of spiritual prosperity - Germany had (in present-day borders) 18 million inhabitants, in 1900 there were 43 million (Colin McEvedy and Richard Jones, Atlas of World Population History, London, 1978, p.68) 11)) In 1926, the award came from "people without space" and has been reinterpreted by the Nazis in politics. Today, two world wars continue to live in Germany 82 million people and the human poverty the eastern and northern countries makes us worry area without people? This is to show that the "too big" or "too small" amount of a population is almost always a matter of the relevant knowledge and the published opinion.
My concern is not the population density in Europe, even if this was the starting point of this consideration, but the ability to adapt. Adaptation or conversion is a creative process that can be refused. We always expect from strangers that they adapt. We must adapt ourselves as living beings always to new environments, as people just to those we themselves have created only patriarchy, democracy. As long as men - whether for romance or other motives - do not have children, women are rarely risk a child.
0 comments:
Post a Comment