the following comment is a personal opinion on the recent developments in the "Anthro-Internet" section. For various reasons we have so far not commented on the Gaza conflict. Not because we believe that issues of time should be apolitical or do, but because we have found the one currently no one to write something to us and secondly because we certainly are aware of the responsibility which requires so sensitive issue.
Censorship in Anthrosphäre?
It attributes a lot of information there on this subject, of course, remains the virtual Anthro-sphere is not spared. In Hermann Finkel Teens Uribiern, a rather "subversive" Anthroseite, in his reading sometimes you do not really know whether it is still fun, or even deadly serious, I found this noteworthy review which is one of the best that I in the last time in Anthro-Blogshäre I read about Gaza. Also on the website of the blogger Canaillo , which is normally dedicated much like the gentlemen from Uribistan in a satirical way of Anthroszene to informative articles related to the events in the Gaza Strip.
I think it is - in contrast to Info3 editor Felix Hau - but for legitimate, articulate personal concern about what is happening in the Gaza Strip, especially in light of the fact that this kind of discussion always take lives. Meanwhile, there are media reports that more than 1300, and certainly there will be other victims. The arrogance and cynicism that are evident in some comments on this topic are nevertheless difficult to sustain. Now you can argue about the contributions that have been put on the web, you may have a different view, but it goes so far that a review by the anthroposophical Information Portal Anthromedia removed because he a blogging editor of the largest circulation anthroposophical magazine in Germany has not fallen, it seems to me remarkable.
Felix Hau, speaking in the context of place in Germany in demonstrations against the war policy of Israel from "psychotic features" a "oblique slave revolt Romance" , outraged at his blog: "Sorry, there are also large parts of the anthroposophical Movement with blindness beaten. The remarkable odyssey so far I have - unfortunately - found at the friendly Internet platform "Anthromedia" The author John Anders is actually not very different from many other .(..) The rest of the sermon -. It moves in the usual manner by the knee-jerk partisanship for seemingly defenseless .. "
For the competent Anthromedia editor apparently reason enough to remove the contribution of Hau criticized after it by himself, it was learned, has been advised of his text was. Our thanks to the editor, the Hau subsequently prefaced his article reveals, unfortunately, once again, a smug arrogance that is with the motto of his paper, namely "Anthroposophy in the dialogue," for me somehow not quite be reconciled.
The author John Anders has provided us with his article available, we have it "published anthroposophical friends on issues of time. " with his "open letter" to the Humanities and bloated anti-Semitism " how Info3 Chief Editor Jens Heisterkamp accuses him we are able to recognize the contribution of John no different.
article by J. different with TDZ
0 comments:
Post a Comment