In the latest review of the Zander book "anthroposophy in Germany" by Patrick Bahners in FAZ is at the end of the talk that "Given the importance of meeting the most important historical journal can win with vocations" , the review of a Basel Anthroposophy (meaning KA Swassjan) in the " Historical Magazine " on " scandal "should be called.
The "Historical Journal", according to his own words: ".. one of the major internationally disseminated research journals since their inception, they are independent of subsidies, ideological groups and organizations and is a representative body of German history.."
Bahners remarks outraged: "You may see the award as a sign of liberalism, the result is a denunciation." , writes in the same paragraph, however, that three faculties had rejected Zanders Habilitation request, as we read in the epilogue of the book is. If the academic performance of the author Zander - were found not - at least from these three faculties? That would interest me now, but still. If someone wants to know what Swassjan with Zanders missing "impartiality and expertise" and the "trash journalism" has meant can read it here .
0 comments:
Post a Comment